Ten Fraud Prevention Tips for Small Businesses: Assess Potential Fraud Risks on an Ongoing Basis

Posting by Debra Andrews
P: 301.272.6094 | E: This e-mail address is being protected from spam bots, you need JavaScript enabled to view it  

Identifying potential risks and instituting proper internal controls to mitigate these risks are essential components to effectively preventing occupational fraud.  However, the risk assessment process must be a dynamic and continuous.  As a company grows and changes, such as adding new employees and/or IT systems,  it is important to reassess potential risks and revisit the internal control policies to ensure that they are still accomplishing their intended goal.  Even if a company has not experienced major staff or structure changes, assessing control policies and risk areas on a regular basis will help to prevent fraud.  

Setting up simple, regular intervals for review will help you to create a sustainable assessment system.  Here are some areas for regular review:

Checking Account and Financial Statements.   Review your checking account and financial statements for suspicious amounts or vendors.  By keeping a regular pulse on the financial state of your business, you will be more likely to recognize fraudulent activity.  These documents should be reviewed on a monthly basis.


For one particular engagement, a client approached Bond Beebe because his company was more profitable than ever, but his cash balance was always low.  Our Forensic Team discovered that the Controller, who had worked for the company for over fifteen years, had embezzled several hundreds of thousands of dollars.  The owner’s awareness of his company’s financial state led to the discovery of these fraudulent activities. 

Segregation of Duties.  Regularly review your company’s segregation of duties for any gaps, especially if there has been staff turnover in the accounting department.  This issue is best dealt with as soon as an employee leaves, but you may find it helpful to set a regular review schedule to ensure that proper separation is maintained. 

Technology Controls.  When reviewing gaps from employee turnover, don’t forget technology controls.  Companies often forget to change access codes and passwords when an employee leaves, leaving their technology at risk.  A regular review of policies and access levels will help to prevent security breaches.

One particular control that Bond Beebe employs is an employee termination checklist policy. The IT administrator must ensure that checklist is properly completed prior to final payment of the former employee and the actions on this checklist are initiated immediately upon notification of the employee’s pending departure. The checklist includes the following items:

  • Access Security - disabling network access, disabling e-mail access, and deleting contact information from all company directories.
  • Data Security - recovering all data from the desktop hard drive and notifying vendors so that this individual cannot place orders or incur obligations on behalf of the company.
  • Final Review – a thorough review of the checklist is performed to make sure all actions have been fully completed.
This policy is more extensive than the items listed above, but this general framework provides a helpful controls that serve to protect the company’s technological assets. 

Company Policies and Educational Processes.  Each year, companies should review their anti-fraud and whistleblower policies to ensure they are still effective for the company’s current size and that they are serving their intended purpose. 

While these are general risk areas that affect every company, it is essential to understand your business’ specific risks, which will depend on your size, structure and industry.  Involve your Board of Directors, Audit Committee, or Certified Public Accountant as appropriate. Larger organizations may want to engage a Certified Fraud Examiner to help it review and develop the appropriate controls.  A small time investment upfront may just pay off by preventing costly occupational fraud.